Re T

legal case · in 2 sources (2017–2018)

Sources by year: 2017: 1 · 2018: 1

Often together

What comes up in the same parts of the videos; the number is how many parts.

The most important statements of each year; all statements.

2018-01-10 · Euthanasia - Medical Ethics and Law at the end of life — Ali Abdaal (channel): The channel corrects the previous video: in Re T it was the refusal that was deemed invalid, not the original consent, as Molly had said. — video description

2017-12-21 · Consent, Capacity and Jehovah's Witnesses - Medical Ethics & Law for interviews — a guest: Re T was a legal case of 1992 about a young pregnant woman who needed a blood transfusion after a car crash. — 00:04:12
- a guest: T came from a family of Jehovah's Witnesses, who have historically opposed transfusion of blood products for religious reasons, which can make doctors' decisions difficult. — 00:04:36
- a guest: In Re T, after time with her Jehovah's Witness mother T refused the transfusion; because doctors felt her mother had pressured her, the refusal was deemed invalid. — 00:05:06
- Ali says applicants need not know case names and dates, but citing even vague details of a case, such as Re T when asked about Jehovah's Witnesses, looks really impressive and shows commitment to medicine. — 00:24:35